My five-year-old daughter, Zoë, will be baptized in a couple of weeks. Amy told her Grandma this the other day, and Grandma responded with “Is it one of those ‘infant’ baptisms, or is it a REAL baptism?”
After getting angry, calming down, and then thinking about it, I think that the answer is “yes”.
(Obviously, Zoë’s not an “infant” at five, but for the sake of this discussion, her upcoming baptism falls under what most people call “infant baptism” — that is, baptism given to the children of believers, usually soon after their birth.)
Baptism — whether it comes after someone has made a profession of faith or it comes after someone’s being born into a Christian home — is baptism. The bifurcation between “infant” baptism and “believer’s” baptism is the creation of a false dichotomy. Both are covenant baptism.
I think I’m going to pick up where I left off in the long-forgotten series of posts on Baptism to flesh this out.
3 comments ↓
Do not damage Z’s eternal destiny by making this foolish decision!
Yes, please, Rae, pick up the series.
I think I’m leaning towards agreeing with you… at least in accepting paedobaptism, if not necessarily being a proponent of it.
Well….
I agree with Grandma.
Hope you and the family are doing well, Rae. How is elder life going?
Leave a Comment